A longtime litigator and federal magistrate judge, Judge Sanket Bulsara is poised to join the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Background
Born in 1977 in the Bronx, Sanket Bulsara graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College in 1998 and then attended Harvard Law School, graduating in 2002. Bulsara then clerked for Judge John Koeltl on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
After his clerkship, Bulsara spent a year at the Los Angeles office of Munger Tolles & Olson LLP before joining Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP. He stayed there, becoming a Partner in 2012, until 2015 (however, Bulsara also spent six months as a Special Assistant District Attorney at the Kings County District Attorney’s Office.
In 2015, Bulsara became Deputy General Counsel at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, and subsequently became Acting General Counsel in January 2017.
In 2017, Bulsara became a federal magistrate judge on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. He serves on that court today.
History of the Seat
Bulsara has been nominated to fill a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. This seat will open on December 19, 2024 when Judge Joan Azrack moves to senior status.
Legal Career
Bulsara started his legal career by clerking on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. After a year at Munger Tolles, Bulsara then worked at Wilmer Hale for a decade. Among the cases he worked on there, Bulsara represented Viviana Vittori, who was defending against the forced return of her children to Italy, where her ex-husband had moved. See Ermini v. Vittori, 758 F.3d 153 (2d Cir. 2014).
Between 2015 and 2017, Bulsara worked at the Securities and Exchange Commission, where he was part of the legal team working on the enforcement actions brought against Charles Kokesh for misappropriation of funds. See SEC v. Kokesh, 834 F.3d 1158 (10th Cir. 2016), rev’d by Kokesh v. SEC, 137 S. Ct. 1635 (U.S. 2017). Bulsara also worked on enforcement actions against John Saad on misappropriation allegations. See Saad v. SEC, 873 F.3d 297 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
Notably, Bulsara was part of the legal team representing the SEC before the Supreme Court defending proceedings against Bassam Salman, who was indicted for insider trading for trading based on information received from his brother-in-law. See Salman v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 420 (U.S. 2016). The Supreme Court unanimously affirmed Salman’s conviction. See id.
Jurisprudence
Bulsara has served as a U.S. Magistrate Judge since his appointment in 2017. As a magistrate judge, Bulsara handles matters related to pretrial release, warrants, and discovery, handles cases by consent, and presides over settlement conferences. During his time as a magistrate judge, Bulsara has also issued over 300 opinions.
Among the opinions he has written, Bulsara has:
- Dismissed a defamation claim brought by a solo practitioner alleging that a blog post written by opposing counsel was defamatory. See Wexler v. Dorsey & Whitney, 18-CV-3066-SJB (E.D.N.Y. 2019) (available at https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3064&context=historical);
- Granted a motion to compel medical records of the plaintiff, finding that the plaintiff had put her medical condition at issue in the case. See Vargas v. United States, 401 F. Supp. 3d 346 (E.D.N.Y. 2018);
- Granted a motion to compel arbitration of a Fair Labor Standards Act claim. See Vargas v. Bay Terrace Plaza LLC., 378 F. Supp. 3d 190 (E.D.N.Y. 2019);
- Granted a motion to exclude a defendant’s expert witness for failure to make inadequate disclosures under the federal rules. See Piepes v. Nai Entertainment Holdings LLC., 394 F. Supp. 3d 315 (E.D.N.Y. 2019).
Political Activity
While at Wilmer Hale, Bulsara made a number of political donations, including to President Barack Obama and then Senator Hillary Clinton.
Overall Assessment
Despite his youth, Bulsara has built up a legal career with extensive experience in the law, including as a practitioner and as a judge. His confirmation should be relatively straightforward.
AliKhan missing the chief judge spot by 4 days will almost certainly be rectified. Both Ali and Sooknanan are young enough to be chief judge, so there would be a Biden chief judge even if one of the two isn’t confirmed/steps down early/gets elevated.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Once Ali & Sooknanan are confirmed, I think the DC district court will be the first court in the country with four judges born in the 1980’s. In contrast, the CDCA, SDNY & EDNY only have one judge born in the 1980’s combined (Natasha Merle). Really good job in DC.
LikeLike
I think you’re right. And even more amazing that it will be done without any of those 4 being Trump judges.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just goes to show you how much work the senate Democrats have to do when it comes to recommending young progressives. The fact that if all four CDCA vacancies are filled with judges born in the 1980’s, the 28 judges on that court would only tie the 13 judges on the C district court. So many missed opportunities despite Biden being the best president ever when it comes to nominating young progressives.
There are 20 district court vacancies left that don’t have a Republican senator able to block the nominee with blue slips & 5 circuit court vacances. Out of the 25 seats, if we could get double digit nominees born 1980 or later, I would be happy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not very impressed with the AZ nominees, they don’t seem to have a progressive, criminal defense or civil rights history but I’ll take Dequans high grades as evidence they’re not as bad as it seems for two blue senators.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I gave the Arizona nominees a B+ & A-. So I agree with you there were certainly more progressive possibilities. I think they were good but not great like the Arizona judge we got for the 9th who I gave an A+ for.
I gave them a bit extra on my grade because of the judges they are replacing. 2 of the 3 judges taking senior status are Republicans & the one Democrat was in his 60’s when Obama nominated him so both of the woman nominated today are big time upgrades regardless of what seat they eventually get nominated for.
LikeLike
https://www.forthedefensepodcast.com/
40 minute interview with judge nancy abudu on her time on the 11th circuit thus far, she announces her gratitude to biden for being serious about appointing diverse judges to the court and for sticking through it, she talks about her confirmation hearing, she talks about how she still pinches herself when she goes to the courthouse and there is an assigned parking space for her and people call her job. She talks about her appreciation for the chief judge pryor and his writing style and how she has grown close to her predecessor martin since she came on the bench, alots more as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@aangren
Awesome. Thanks for sharing. I’m looking forward to listening to it later tonight when I get some time.
LikeLike
Just saw on the U.S. judicial site that Camela Theeler has been nominated to Judge Viken’s seat even though it’s likely she is going to stay in Sioux Falls.
Likely means Eric Schulte will be the one going to Rapid City if someone has to move.
On a different note, after the two FL nominees get confirmed, I hope we see movement on the Circuit court nominees but it won’t shock me if we see the last NJ or UT district court nominees get movement on them given that they are judicial emergencies (Viken’s seat is as well now which is why I suspect we finally got a deal on the South Dakota seats.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m still happy & proud of Schumer for not adding recess time after they worked through the start of last week. No time to waste of Republicans are gonna force floor votes on non controversial nominees.
For God sake Lund for six no votes. She is a certified Republican that was considered for the Indiana Supreme Court. If she gets six no votes then there’s definitely gonna be minimal to no voice votes for judicial nominees the rest of the year.
LikeLike
IMO, that means the Republican nominees get moved to the back of the line.
LikeLike
That should have been the plan all along. Voice votes or Republican picks wait until there is a senate Democrat out or until they run out of Democrats to vote on. Maybe Schumer wants to confirm them so fast to encourage other Republicans to turn in their blue slips but it shouldn’t come at the expense of the more liberal nominees when all 51 Democrats are in session.
LikeLike
Laroski was confirmed unanimously (except Hawley and Sullivan didn’t show up so those two kept their 0% rate of voting for Biden judges)
LikeLiked by 1 person
And no surprise both Hawley & Sullivan have judicial vacancies in their state & have filled zero. I’m willing to bet if you look at the next closest 2-3 senators just under 100% voting against, we will find a similar story.
LikeLike
SJC meeting posted for next Thursday:
The red state nominees from December will have a vote, but the nominees from the hearing on the 9th aren’t listed, there’s a few attorneys and Marshalls listed for the first time however.
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/committee-activity/hearings/02/29/2024/executive-business-meeting
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sanket Bulsara is The Legend!
LikeLike