Detra Shaw-Wilder – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Recommended both by Sen. Marco Rubio and Florida House Democrats, Coral Gables attorney Detra Shaw-Wilder has now been nominated to fill the last vacancy on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Background

Detra Shaw-Wilder received a B.S. from the University of Florida in 1990 and a J.D. from the University of Miami School of Law in 1994. After graduation, Shaw-Wilder joined Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton, where she became Managing Partner in 2015 and General Counsel since 2017.

History of the Seat

Shaw-Wilder has been nominated for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to replace Judge Robert Scola, who took senior status on October 31, 2023. Shaw-Wilder was the only candidate that was simultaneously recommended for the federal bench in 2021 by Senator Marco Rubio and Florida House Democrats, but was not nominated in the 3 judge batch put forward in late 2023.

Legal Career

Shaw-Wilder has spent her entire legal career at the Coral Gables firm Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton where she currently serves as General Counsel. While at the firm, Shaw-Wilder has represented limousine drivers in a suit for overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act. See Vidinliev v. Carey Intern. Inc. 581 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (N.D. Ga. 2008). Shaw-Wilder also represented three law firms in obtaining a large judgment against two attorneys for impropriety in settling various lawsuits. See Kane v. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, 197 So. 3d 137 (Fla. App. 4th Dist. 2016).

Shaw-Wilder has also handled a number of federal appeals, including persuading the Eleventh Circuit to reverse a default judgment against Costa Rican corporation Parrot Bay Village, for lack of jurisdiction over the defendant. See Oldfield v. Pueblo de Bahia Lora, S.A., 558 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2009).

Political Activity

Shaw-Wilder has a number of political donations to her name, all to Florida Democrats, including former federal judicial nominee Mary Barzee Flores during her run for Congress.

Overall Assessment

The last three nominations put forward to the Southern District with the support of Florida senators have sailed to confirmation. As of now, there is little reason to believe that Shaw-Wilder’s experience will be any different.

Judge Jacqueline Becerra – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

A prominent South Florida attorney turned U.S. Magistrate Judge, Judge Jackie Becerra rounds out three nominations made by the Biden Administration to fill vacancies on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Background

Born in Miami Beach in 1970, Jacqueline Becerra graduated from the University of Miami in 1991 and then from Yale Law School in 1994. Becerra then joined the U.S. Department of Justice, working in the Civil Division and then the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. In 1999, Becerra shifted to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida.

In 2004, Becerra became a Shareholder at Greenberg Traurig P.A. in Miami. In 2019, she was appointed to be a U.S. Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of Florida, where she currently serves.

History of the Seat

Becerra has been nominated for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. This seat opened on July 15, 2022, when Judge Marcia Cooke moved to senior status.

Legal Career

Becerra started her legal career at the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, where she stayed for three years, working on civil defense in litigation across the United States.

Between 1997 and 2004, Becerra worked as a federal prosecutor, first in D.C. and then with the U.S. Attorney’s for the Southern District of Florida. Notably, Becerra prosecuted four Miami police officers for excessive force in their beating of an individual under arrest. See United States v. Aguero, No. 1:02-cr-20174-ALTONAGA (S.D. Fla. 2002). This case ended in a voluntary dismissal by the government due to a change in the victim testimony at trial.

Between 2004 and 2019, Becerra worked at Greenberg Traurig in Miami. In this role, Becerra primarily worked on commercial litigation matters as well as regulatory compliance. Notably, Becerra represented Miami-based Tiger Direct in a suit against Apple Computer over an advertising campaign that referenced Tiger. See Tiger Direct Inc. v. Apple Computer, Inc., No. 1:05-cv-21136-LENARD (S.D. Fla. 2005).

Jurisprudence

Since 2019, Becerra has served as a U.S. Magistrate Judge on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. In this role, Becerra presides over cases by agreement, writes reports and recommendations for district judges, and handles pretrial motions, discovery disputes, and bail matters. During her tenure, Becerra has presided over four trials.

Among the notable cases where parties consented to her jurisdiction, Becerra denied a motion to compel arbitration brought by defendants in a trademark infringement action, finding that the plaintiffs were not signatories to the arbitration clause signed by their affiliates. See Taylor Grp., Inc. v. Indus. Distribs. Int’l Co., 522 F. Supp. 3d 1212 (S.D. Fla. 2021), aff’d, 859 F. App’x 439 (11th Cir. 2021). Becerra’s decision was subsequently affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit.

Political Activity

Before she became a judge, Becerra had an extensive political donation history, all to Democrats, including multiple donations to President Obama and to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

Overall Assessment

While arguably the most “liberal” of the three South Florida nominees put forward by the Biden Administration, Becerra is still likely to fit within the mainstream of judges on the Southern District of Florida. While she would likely draw more opposition than her co-nominees, Becerra is still likely to be confirmed comfortably.

Judge Melissa Damian – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

After being considered by both the Obama and Trump Administrations for a judicial vacancy, Judge Melissa Damian has been tapped by President Biden for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Background

Melissa Damian received a B.A. from Princeton University in 1990 and a J.D. from the University of Miami School of Law in 1995. After graduation, Damian clerked for Judge Ursula Ungaro on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida and then joined Kenny Nachwalter P.A. as an associate. In 1999, Damian became a federal prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida.

In 2010, Damian joined The Ferraro Law Firm as appellate counsel and then moved to Damian & Valori as Of Counsel in 2013. In 2021, Damian was selected to be a U.S. Magistrate Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where she currently serves.

Damian has applied and been interviewed for a seat on the Southern District of Florida both in 2014, under the Obama Administration and in 2017 under the Trump Administration, but was not selected in either case.

History of the Seat

Damian has been nominated for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida to replace Damian’s old boss, Judge Ursula Ungaro, who took senior status on May 2, 2021.

Legal Career

While Damian started her career as a clerk for Judge Ungaro and then at Kenny Nachwalter P.A., her first extended job was at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, where she spent eleven years. Notably, during this tenure, Damian prosecuted George Freeman, a Washington D.C. high school teacher convicted of importing cocaine from Barbados. See United States v. Freeman, 139 F. Supp. 2d 1364 (S.D. Fla. 2001). After a guilty verdict in Freeman’s second trial, Judge Adalberto Jordan nonetheless found that Freeman’s continuous denial of any knowledge of the contents of the suitcase was truthful, notwithstanding the jury verdict, and that he should be entitled to avoid a mandatory minimum sentence. See id. at 1374.

Between 2010 and 2021, Damian worked in private practice in South Florida. During this time, Damian handled a variety of civil actions, including a personal injury lawsuit brought against Disneyworld by a plaintiff allegedly injured on a roller-coaster. See Randall v. Walt Disney World Co., 140 So. 3d 1118 (Fla. App. 5th 2014). Damian also sued attorneys representing a company founded by “financier-turned-fraudster” Aubrey Lee Price in seeking to recoup losses suffered by investors from the fraud. See Damian v. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, 317 F. Supp. 3d 1228 (N.D. Ga. 2017). Damian has also represented plaintiffs in products liability actions. See, e.g., Rouviere v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., 560 F. Supp. 3d 774 (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Notably, Damian represented Ariel Quiros, who was sued for securities fraud by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). See S.E.C. v. Quiros, 966 F.3d 1195 (11th Cir. 2020).

Jurisprudence

Damian has served as a U.S. Magistrate Judge on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida since 2022. In this role, Damian presides over matters where parties consent to her jurisdiction, writes reports and recommendations for district judges to review, and handles discovery disputes, release matters, and pretrial motions. For example, Damian denied a motion by Royal Caribbean to disqualify a plaintiff’s expert witness in a maritime negligence case in which a passenger was injured by slipping on a gangway. See Jay v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., 608 F. Supp. 3d 1249 (S.D. Fla. 2022).

Among the notable cases where the parties consented to her jurisdiction, Damian partially granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings from the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, which filed suit seeking to enforce an arbitration award against the Italba Corporation. See Oriental Republic of Uruguay v. Italba Corp., 606 F. Supp. 3d 1250 (S.D. Fla. 2022). Specifically, Damian denied the portion of Uruguay’s request for prejudgment interest on the award, finding that the arbitration panel already denied Uruguay’s request for prejudgment interest. See id. at 1261.

Political Activity

Damian has a history of donating to candidates from both political parties, having given to Democratic Gubernatorial candidates Bill McBride and Charlie Crist, as well as Republican U.S. Senator Rick Scott and Attorney General Ashley Moody.

Overall Assessment

Having extensive legal experience with both civil and criminal law, as well as close connections in the South Florida legal community, Damian should be a relatively uncontroversial nominee. Given the Southern District’s need for additional judge, Damian’s confirmation will likely be a welcome relief for the judges on the bench.

David Leibowitz – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

The nephew of Norman Braman, a billionaire and longtime benefactor of Sen. Marco Rubio, David Leibowitz was first proposed as a judicial nominee during the Trump Administration, but was never nominated. Leibowitz has now been tapped by President Biden for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Background

David Seymour Leibowitz received his B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania in 1993, a Ph.D. from the London School of Economics in 1998, and a J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 2000. Leibowitz then clerked for Justice Robert Flanders on the Rhode Island Supreme Court.

After finishing his clerkship, Leibowitz worked as an Assistant District Attorney in Cambridge, Massachusetts and then became a federal prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York in 2003.

In 2012, Leibowitz returned to Florida to join Braman Management (an umbrella company managing the automotive businesses owned by his billionaire uncle Norman Braman). He has served as Secretary and General Counsel since 2015.

History of the Seat

Leibowitz has been nominated for a vacancy on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. This seat opened when Judge Federico Moreno moved to senior status on July 17, 2020. Florida Senator Marco Rubio recommended Leibowitz to the Trump Administration to fill the vacancy in April 2020. See Jay Weaver, Rubio Holds Sway Over Judge Picks, With Benefactor Braman’s Nephew on Tap For Miami Slot, Miami Herald, Apr. 30, 2020, https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article242390041.html. However, Leibowitz was not nominated as the Administration instead focused on Renatha Francis, who had her initial nomination to the Florida Supreme Court blocked by a lawsuit. See David Oscar Markus, Did the Dems Win the Fight Against DeSanctis Regarding the Florida Supreme Court, Southern District of Florida Blog, Sept. 15, 2020, https://sdfla.blogspot.com/2020/09/did-dems-win-fight-against-desantis.html.

After the election of Biden, Rubio recommended Leibowitz again to replace Moreno. See David Oscar Markus, Breaking – Rubio JNC Names Finalists, Southern District of Florida Blog, July 21, 2021, https://sdfla.blogspot.com/2021/07/breaking-rubio-jnc-announces-finalists.html. After extended conversations, Leibowitz was nominated to the vacancy along with two other nominees more favored by the Administration.

Legal Experience

Leibowitz started his legal career as a state prosecutor in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where, among other prosecutions, he handled appeals. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Thad T., a Juvenile, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 497 (2003). Between 2003 and 2012, Leibowitz worked as a federal prosecutor for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, where he handled a wide variety of cases. Among his more prominent cases, Leibowitz prosecuted Michael and Eric Nouri, executives at Smart Online Inc. for manipulation of their stock. See United States v. Nouri, 711 F.3d 129 (2d Cir. 2013). In another notable case, Leibowitz was government counsel in a motion brought by James Cromitie, who alleged that government agents had entrapped and encouraged him to engage in religiously-motivated terrorist activity. See United States v. Cromitie, 781 F. Supp. 2d 211 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Cromitie’s motion, acknowledging that government agents largely facilitated Cromitie’s terrorist activities, but noted that he had largely participated and engaged without any coercion or pressure from the government. See id.

Leibowitz also had the opportunity to argue some appeals as a federal prosecutor. For example, he worked alongside future federal judge Diane Gujarati and future New York Court of Appeals Judge Michael Garcia on an appeal in defending a sentencing where the judge failed to allow the defendant a chance to address the court prior to sentencing (which the court of appeals found warranted resentencing). See United States v. Gonzalez, 529 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2008).

From 2012 onwards, Leibowitz has worked at Braman Management, notably serving as Secretary and General Counsel since 2015. During this time, Leibowitz helped represent Braman in commercial litigation. See, e.g., Braman Motors, Inc. v. BMW of North America LLC, Case No. 17-CV-23360-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES. For example, Leibowitz was part of the legal team defending Braman in a suit brought over an unsolicited voicemail left for the plaintiff. See Schaevitz v. Braman Hyundai, Inc., 437 F.Supp.3d 1237 (S.D. Fla. 2019).

Writings

Throughout his legal career, Leibowitz has frequently written on issues in the law, starting with a doctoral thesis advocating for judges to behave “sincerely” instead of behaving “strategically” to influence the law as a judge. See David Seymour Leibowitz, American Constitutional Communication: Appellate Court Opinions and the Implications for Judicial Power of the United States, A Dissertation Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Department of Government, London School of Economics (August 1997).

In another notable article that he coauthored, Leibowitz was critical of the U.S. Supreme Court’s majority decision in U.S. v. Morrison, which struck down portions of the Violence Against Women Act as violative of the Commerce Clause. See Louis J. Virelli III, David Leibowitz, “Federalism Whether They Want It Or Not”: The New Commerce Clause Doctrine and the Future of Federal Civil Rights Legislation After United States v. Morrison, 3 U. Penn. J. Con. L. 3 (2001) (available at https://deliverypdf.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID=550083013021093025088127093096120109019053019081050000104123064004026109095112098007032035042036057108108080070116112000114001107011054000040113113096120116098006009021057027067074108015120094026066070026007111076007023030071017075097086102105073121&EXT=pdf&INDEX=TRUE). For example, the article noted:

“In short, civil rights laws are readily at odds with principles of state autonomy. This does not mean, however, as the Morrison court seemed to believe, that we should eliminate Congress’s power to promote social equity in the name of state autonomy. See id. at 962.

The article went on to note that the narrow conception of Congressional authority “will fashion new standards of state governance that will effectively preclude future federal protection of disadvantaged minorities.” Id. at 964.

Political Activity

Leibowitz has a history of donating to candidates of both political parties. For example, in 2017-18 campaign season, Leibowitz donated to Republican Congressmen Robert Pittenger, Chuck Fleischmann, Brian Fitzpatrick, and Carlos Curbelo, and to Democratic Congressmen Charlie Crist, Al Lawson, and David Cicilline.

Overall Assessment

As a candidate primarily advocated by a home-state senator from the opposing party, Leibowitz is an unusual candidate for the Biden Administration. Additionally, Leibowitz’s familial connection with Braman could lead to suggestions that he was primarily nominated due to his connections rather than merit. However, Leibowitz’s overall record suggests a candidate who has extensive experience with the law. Additionally, Leibowitz’s writings, on both judicial modesty and critical of court interventions in civil rights legislation, suggest that his views are not that different from most of Biden’s other nominees. As such, it will be interesting to see what Leibowitz’s jurisprudence ends up being.

Aileen Cannon – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

39-year-old AUSA Aileen Cannon is President Trump’s fifth nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and would be the first woman to join the court under his tenure as President.

Background

Aileen Cannon received her B.A. in Public Policy Studies from Duke University in 2003 and her J.D. magna cum laude from the University of Michigan Law School in 2007.  In between undergraduate and law school, Cannon spent two years as a paralegal with the Civil Rights Division at the U.S. Department of Justice.  After receiving her J.D., Cannon clerked for Judge Steven Colloton on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

After finishing her clerkship, Cannon became an associate with Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.  In 2013, she became a federal prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, where she continues to work there to this day.

History of the Seat

Cannon has been nominated for a vacancy on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  This seat opened when Judge Kenneth Marra moved to senior status on August 1, 2017.  

Legal Experience

Cannon’s legal career can be divided into two primary segments: working as an associate at Gibson Dunn, and being a federal prosecutor.  In the former role, Cannon primarily practiced civil litigation.  However, in the latter capacity, Cannon developed most of her legal experience, working with the Major Crimes division on criminal prosecutions and appeals.  Among her more prominent cases, Cannon prosecuted perpetrators of identity thefts who were rampant throughout Southern Florida.[1] 

Cannon currently works with the appellate division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office.  Among the more prominent appeals, Cannon has argued successfully that evidence obtained against a defendant through a wiretap was consistent with the Fourth Amendment.[2]  Cannon has also been called upon to defend sentencing decisions made by U.S. District Court judges, including decisions which have been reversed by the Eleventh Circuit.[3]

Overall Assessment

As of this point, the Trump Administration has made an art form of finding attorneys who barely squeeze in under the twelve year practice requirement that the American Bar Association seeks for judges. Cannon, while still under forty, has practiced for approximately twelve years (including her clerkship) and has experience with civil and criminal litigation.  As there are few controversies in her background, she will likely be confirmed comfortably for the federal bench, and will be a prime candidate to fill a Florida vacancy on the Eleventh Circuit in the future.


[1] See Press Release, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Southern District of Florida, Defendants Charged in Separate Fraud Schemes That Resulted in Thousands of Identities Stolen and Used to Commit Fraud Crimes, US Fed News, Apr. 9, 2015.

[2] See United States v. Maxi, 886 F.3d 1318 (11th Cir. 2018).

[3] See, e.g., United States v. McCloud, 818 F.3d 591 (11th Cir. 2016) (reversing sentencing for treating prior armed robbery convictions as separate offenses under the Armed Career Criminal Act).  See also United States v. Charles, 757 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir. 2014) (reversing application of sentencing enhancement to increase sentence).

Judge Raag Singhal – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Florida state court judge Raag Singhal is nothing if not persistent, having applied to be a judge 15 times before he was selected.  Singhal is now up for a federal judgeship after narrowly missing an appointment to the Florida Supreme Court.

Background

Anuraag Hari “Raag” Singhal was born in Philadelphia in 1963, the son of Indian parents who had moved to the U.S. in 1960.[1]  Singhal attended Rice University and Wake Forest University Law School.[2]

After graduation, Singhal spent a year with Fleming, O’Brien & Fleming as an Associate and then became a prosecutor in Ft. Lauderdale.[3]  In 1993, Singhal became a Partner in a criminal defense practice in Ft. Lauderdale, which he maintained until 2011.[4] 

In 2011, Singhal, who had previously applied fifteen times to be a judge, was finally appointed to be a Circuit Court Judge in Broward County by Republican Governor Rick Scott.  His appointment made him the first Asian-American judge in the county and only the third in Florida.[5]  Singhal continues to serve on that court.

In 2019, Singhal was considered by Gov. Ron DeSantis for appointment to the Florida Supreme Court, but DeSantis chose three other candidates instead.[6]

History of the Seat

Singhal has been nominated for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  This seat opened on August 5, 2016, when Judge James Cohn moved to senior status.  In October 2017, Singhal applied and interviewed with the Judicial Nominating Commission (JNC) formed by Florida Senators Marco Rubio and Bill Nelson.  The JNC chose Singhal as one of ten finalists to be passed onto the Senators.[7]  After interviews with Rubio and Nelson, Singhal was contacted by the Trump Administration in February 2018.[8]  After interviewing with the White House Counsel’s Office and the Department of Justice, Singhal was not contacted for a year before vetting resumed in April 2019.  Singhal was ultimately nominated in August 2019.  

Legal Career

For most of his pre-bench legal career, Singhal has worked as a criminal defense attorney, handling both white collar and violent crime cases.  Over the course of his career, Singhal tried over 200 jury trials, including 33 First Degree Murder cases.[9]  Singhal also accepted court appointments to represent difficult or problematic clients.

Among his most prominent appointments, Singhal was appointed to represent serial killer Aileen Wuornos, who was awaiting execution.[10]  While representing her, Singhal came to believe that Wuornos was not competent to be executed and communicated as such to the Florida Supreme Court.[11]  In response, then-Gov. Jeb Bush stayed Wuornos’ execution, pending review from psychiatrists.[12]  However, the examiners found Wuornos to be competent and she was subsequently executed.[13]  Even after the execution, which Wuornos had wanted, Singhal maintained his belief that she was insane.[14]

Jurisprudence

Singhal served as a Circuit Judge in Broward County since 2011.  As a Circuit Judge, Singhal handles major felonies and any civil cases with more than $15000 in controversy.  Over his eight year tenure on state court, Singhal has heard approximately 8000 cases, including over 450 trials.  Interestingly, Singhal was on the bench when an inmate slipped through his restraints and escaped in the middle of open court.[15]  The inmate later apologized to Singhal, who stayed on the case despite being named as a defense witness, arguing that he was escaping to obtain evidence of his innocence.[16] 

Most recently, Singhal presided over suits related to Brenda Snipes, the head of the Broward County Election Board, who has been criticized by Republicans for her poor management of elections.[17]  In August 2018, Singhal issued an injunction ordering Snipes not to open vote-by-mail ballots before they could be reviewed by the Canvassing Board.[18]  Singhal also presided over a suit brought by law professor Tim Canova, who alleged that ballots had been improperly destroyed by Snipes in his race against Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz.[19]  Singhal ruled that Snipes acted contrary to state and federal law in destroying ballots in the race.[20]

Political Activity

Other than his own campaigns for judicial office, Singhal has volunteered with the Broward County Republican Party as an attorney.[21]  Singhal resigned his post with the Republican Party in 2010 to support the Independent Senate candidacy of Gov. Charlie Crist (Crist is now a Democrat serving in Congress).[22] 

Singhal has also been a member of the South Florida Chapter of the Federalist Society since 2011.[23]

Speeches, Writings, and Public Statements

As a criminal defense attorney, Singhal frequently spoke out in support of more compassionate sentencing and a reduction in over-incarceration.  For example, Singhal has generally pushed for treatment of drug addicts rather than incarceration.[24]  He has also argued for the reduction in federal disparities on crack cocaine sentencing, noting that the disparity unfairly targets African Americans for incarceration.[25]

Singhal has also been a strong advocate of more compassionate treatment of offenders convicted of white collar crimes, noting in one interview:

“Typically, the white collar criminal is more able to do good things than other people charged with violent offenses, and that’s just the way it is.”[26]

In the same interview, he pushed back against suggestions that white collar criminals are given special treatment, arguing that the disparity in sentencing for non-violent drug offenders and white collar criminals speaks in favor of leniency for both rather than stricter sentences.[27]

Overall Assessment

While Singhal has a long history with the Federalist Society and the Republican Party, he is unlikely be considered a controversial nominee.  This is primarily for two reasons.  First, as a criminal defense attorney, Singhal has a long record of advocating for the rights of defendants, which is likely to appeal to Democrats such as Sen. Cory Booker, who are passionate about overincarceration and implicit bias in criminal justice.  Second, Singhal’s record as a judge is fairly uncontroversial and does not demonstrate a bias towards any party.  As such, Singhal is likely to get a fairly comfortable confirmation and will present a moderate conservative voice on the Southern District of Florida.


[1] Paula McMahon, Broward’s First Asian-American Judge Formally Sworn In, South Florida Sun Sentinel, Jan. 20, 2012, https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-xpm-2012-01-20-fl-first-asian-american-judge-broward-20120120-story.html.  

[2] Sen. Comm. on the Judiciary, 116th Cong., Anuraag Singhal: Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees 1.

[3] Id. at 2.

[4] Id.

[5] See McMahon, supra n. 1.

[6] John Breslin, DeSantis Set to Announce Appointment of Second Supreme Court Justice, Florida Record, Jan. 14, 2019, https://flarecord.com/stories/511720805-desantis-set-to-announce-appointment-of-second-supreme-court-justice.  

[7] David Markus, Breaking — JNC Makes the Cut to 10 Finalists for District Judge, Southern District of Florida Blog, Nov. 29, 2017, http://sdfla.blogspot.com/2017/11/breaking-jnc-makes-cut-to-10-finalists.html.

[8] See Singhal, supra n. 1 at 64.

[9] Id. at 55.

[10] See Jackie Hallifax, Lawyer Tells High Court of ‘Grave Doubts’ About Wuornos, A.P., Sept. 24, 2002.

[11] Id. 

[12] Jackie Hallifax, Gov. Bush Issues Stays of Two Executions; Inmates’ Mental Competence to Waive Appeals at Issue, A.P., Sept. 30, 2002.

[13] Ron Word, Female Serial Killer Executed For Murders of Six Men, A.P., Oct. 9, 2002.

[14] Rich McKay, ‘I’ll Be Back,’ Serial Killer Declares Before Her Execution; Grin, Final Words Puzzle Witnesses, Orlando Sentinel, Oct. 10, 2002.

[15] See Elahe Izadi, ‘Worst Fears Were Realized’: Manhunt Underway for Murder Suspect Who Escaped Courthouse; Dayonte Resiles, 21, Escaped the Broward County Courthouse on Friday Morning, Leaving His Shackles and Jumpsuit Behind, Wash. Post, July 15, 2016.

[16] Ariel Zilber, ‘I Hope You Don’t Take It Personal’: Florida Man on Trial for Murder Pens Apology Letter to Judge After Escaping His Courtroom ‘To Gather Evidence That Would Prove My Innocence’, Daily Mail, Sept. 11, 2016.

[17] See Alana Goodman, Republicans Protest Broward County Election Overseer Who Is a Registered Democrat With Years of Ballot Blunders – As Lawyer Who Commissioned ‘Golden Showers’ Dossier Pushes For Recount to Topple Florida GOP ‘Winners’, Daily Mail, Nov. 9, 2018.

[18] See id.

[19] Marc Caputo, Florida to Monitor Broward Election Chief After Judge Finds ‘Unlawful’ Ballot Destruction in Wasserman Schultz Race, Politico, May 14, 2018.

[20] See id.

[21] See Anna Scott, Political System is Broken, Crist Says, Sarasota Herald Tribune, Apr. 30, 2010.

[22] See id.

[23] See Singhal, supra n. 1 at 5.

[24] See, e.g., William Raspberry, A Contemptible System, Wash. Post, Oct. 21, 2002.

[25] See Genaro C. Armas, State Prison Populations Levelling Off, While Federal Facilities Have Largest Increases, A.P. Int’l, Apr. 11, 2002.

[26] Interview with Neal Conan, Penalties Against White-Collar Crime, Nat’l Pub. Radio Talk of the Nation, Jan. 8, 2003.

[27] See id.

Judge Rodney Smith – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Judge Rodney Smith was the second African American judicial nominee to be sent forward by the Trump Administration when he was nominated back in May.  Now, as his nomination finally starts moving, Smith is poised to fill a long-pending vacancy on the court.

Background

A native Floridian, Rodney Smith was born in Orlando in 1974.  Smith graduated from Florida A&M University in 1996 and then from Michigan State University School of Law in 1999.[1]

After graduation, Smith joined the Miami-Dade County State’s Attorney’s Office, working as a prosecutor.[2]  In 2003, he moved briefly to the Office of the General Counsel at the United Automobile Insurance Company and then to the firm of McGrain Nosich & Ganz P.A.[3]  He left the firm a year later to join the Law Office of Rebecca W. Ribler as a Senior Trial Attorney.  In 2007, he shifted again to become Senior Assistant City Attorney for the City of Miami Beach.[4]

In 2008, Smith became a County Court Judge, appointed to the position by then-Republican Governor Charlie Crist.  In 2012, Smith was appointed by Gov. Rick Scott to be a Circuit Court Judge on the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, where he sits to this day.

History of the Seat

Smith has been nominated for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  This seat opened on June 2, 2014, when Judge Robin Rosenbaum was elevated to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.  On February 26, 2015, Mary Barzee Flores, a former state court judge in Florida, was nominated by President Obama for the vacancy.[5]  However, while Flores had been recommended for the vacancy by the Judicial Nominating Commission (JNC) formed by Florida Senators Marco Rubio and Bill Nelson, Rubio refused to return a blue slip on Flores.[6]  Rubio’s stance was criticized by both Republicans and Democrats who described Flores as an “excellent judge.”[7]  Later, Rubio claimed that Flores had misrepresented her past support for the American Civil Liberties Union and other organizations.[8]  With Rubio’s opposition, Flores never got a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee and was not confirmed before the end of the Obama Administration.

In October 2017, Smith applied and interviewed with the JNC.  The JNC chose Smith as one of ten finalists to be passed onto the Senators.[9]  After interviews with Rubio and Nelson, Smith interviewed with the White House Counsel’s Office and the Department of Justice.  Smith was formally nominated on May 8, 2018.

Legal Career

Smith began his legal career as a state prosecutor in Miami-Dade County, where he served as the Chief of the Juvenile Division and worked in the Career Criminal/Robbery Division.[10]  As the former, Smith was able to secure a conviction against a defendant who emotionally and sexually abused his step-daughter, even though the child’s mother testified against her.[11]

From 2003 to 2007, Smith worked in private practice.  While working for Rebecca Ribler, Smith defended a case against a plaintiff who broke her hip slipping and falling while exiting the defendant’s restaurant.[12]

From 2007 to 2008, Smith worked as Senior Assistant City Attorney in Miami Beach, defending the city against litigation while also prosecuting ordinance violations.  During his time at the office, Smith successfully obtained summary judgment against a plaintiff who had been rendered a quadriplegic after diving into the ocean and striking a rock.[13]

Jurisprudence

Smith served as a County Court Judge in Florida from 2008 to 2012 and has served as a Circuit Judge since 2012.  In the former capacity, Smith heard criminal misdemeanor and traffic matters, civil protective orders, and landlord-tenant and small claims litigation.  As a Circuit Judge, Smith handles major felonies and any civil cases with more than $15000 in controversy.

Over his ten year tenure on state court, Smith has heard approximately 700 cases.  Of these, approximately 3% have been reversed by a higher court, a relatively low reversal rate.[14]  Of the cases in which Smith has been reversed, approximately one in five involved a confession of error by the prevailing party.[15]

Overall Assessment

Smith is a relatively uncontroversial choice for the federal bench.  His judicial record is fairly mainstream and he has not made any controversial statements or actions in his career.  Additionally, his record as a lawyer is fairly varied and it is hard to argue that Smith lacks the ability to be a district court judge.  As such, Smith will likely be confirmed with bipartisan support.


[1] Sen. Comm. on the Judiciary, 115th Cong., Rodney Smith: Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees 1.

[2] Id. at 2.

[3] Id.

[4] Id.

[5] Press Release, Obama White House Archives, President Obama Nominates Two to Serve on the United States District Courts (Feb. 26, 2015).

[6] Jay Weaver, Rubio Holds Up Obama Nominee He Once Backed for Miami Federal Bench, Miami Herald, Feb. 28, 2016, https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article63008137.html.  

[7] See id. (quoting Tom Spencer).

[8] Marc Caputo and Seung Min Kim, Rubio Breaks Silence on Female Judge, Politico, June 9, 2016, https://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/marco-rubio-judge-mary-barzee-flores-224073.  

[9] David Markus, Breaking — JNC Makes the Cut to 10 Finalists for District Judge, Southern District of Florida Blog, Nov. 29, 2017, http://sdfla.blogspot.com/2017/11/breaking-jnc-makes-cut-to-10-finalists.html.

[10] See Smith, supra n. 1 at 46.

[11] State v. Yanes, No. F01-029698, aff’d, 865 So.2d 507 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

[12] O’Brien v. GMRI, Inc. d/b/a Bahama Breeze, Case No. 04-23037 CA 20.

[13] Downs v. City of Miami Beach, et al., Case No. 04-08735 CA 15 and Case No. 06-20861 CIV-HUCK/BANDSTRA, aff’d, 13 So.3d 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

[14] See Smith, supra n. 1 at 38.

[15] Id. at 37-41.

Roy Altman – Nominee for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

A former federal prosecutor, Roy Altman was on the shortlist to be the top federal prosecutor in the Southern District of Florida before getting the nod for a judgeship instead.  Today, at age 36, Altman is the youngest judge Trump has nominated, and the youngest judicial nominee put forward since Judge David Bunning was nominated in 2001.

Background

Roy Kalman Altman was born in Caracas, Venezuela in 1982.  Altman received his B.A. cum laude from Columbia University in 2004 and his J.D. from Yale Law School in 2007.[1]  After receiving his J.D., Altman clerked for Judge Stanley Marcus on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

After finishing his clerkship, Altman became a federal prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, staying with the office for six years.[2]  During his last year at the office, Altman served as Deputy Chief of the Special Prosecutions Section of the office.[3]  In 2014, Altman joined the Miami office of Podhurst Orseck, P.A. as a Partner.[4]  He continues to work there to this day.

In 2017, Altman’s name was floated as a candidate to be U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida by the newly elected Trump Administration.[5]  The Administration ultimately ended up nominating Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Ariana Fajardo Orshan to that position.[6]

History of the Seat

Altman has been nominated for a vacancy on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  This seat opened when Judge Joan Lenard moved to senior status on July 1, 2017.  In October 2017, Altman interviewed with the Judicial Nominating Commission (JNC) formed by Florida Senators Marco Rubio and Bill Nelson.  The JNC chose Altman as one of ten finalists to be passed onto the Senators.[7]  After interviews with Rubio and Nelson, Altman Altman was contacted by the Trump Administration in February 2018.[8]  After interviewing with the White House Counsel’s Office and the Department of Justice, Altman was formally nominated on May 8, 2018.

Legal Experience

Altman’s legal career can be divided into two primary segments: working as a federal prosecutor; and being a Partner at Podhurst Orseck.  As a federal prosecutor, Altman handled a wide variety of cases, including drug crimes, white collar crimes, and immigration cases.[9]  During his time at the office, Altman had 22 jury trials (two as sole counsel, and 15 as lead counsel), and argued three appeals before the Eleventh Circuit.[10]  Among his more prominent cases, Altman prosecuted sex-trafficker Damian St. Patrick Baston and obtained a twenty-seven year sentence.[11]  During the trial, Altman’s cross-examination prompted Baston to accuse the attorney of being “an evil dude,” an outburst which did not ultimately help him either in the guilt or sentencing phases.[12]

From December 2014 onwards, Altman has worked as a Partner at Podhurst Orseck, working primarily in aviation disaster litigation.[13]  Notably, Altman represents the families of passengers killed in the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, handling a multidistrict litigation before Judge Ketanji Jackson in Washington D.C.[14]

Writings

Over the last few years, Altman has occasionally voiced his opinion on public policy issues, usually advocating for conservative positions.

Border Security

In 2013, Altman authored an op-ed criticizing the recent Ninth Circuit decision in United States v. Cotterman.[15]  The Cotterman decision held that border patrol agents could not conduct a forensic search of a laptop seized at the border without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.[16]  In his op-ed, Altman sharply criticizes the opinion, stating that the reasonable suspicion standard “will severely restrict the ability of federal agents to protect America’s borders.”[17]  He also argues that the opinion is “unworkable” and suggests that the Supreme Court should overturn the opinion (the Supreme Court denied to review the Cotterman decision, which remains good law to this day).

Search Incident to Arrest

In 2014, Altman authored an article advocating for an expansion of the search-incident-to-arrest doctrine (a doctrine that permits warrantless searches of items found on or around an arrestee’s person) to cover cell phones.[18]  In the article, Altman argues that, despite the storage capacity of modern cell phones, that:

“There is likewise little reason to treat cell phones differently because they may contain more “personal” information than a briefcase, suitcase, or address book.”[19]

Altman goes on to argue that criminals frequently use cell phones to “facilitate their illegal enterprises” and as such, they should not be granted protection against searches incident to arrest.[20]

Iran Deal

Altman has also been sharply critical of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (Iran Nuclear Deal).  In a 2015 editorial, Altman urged Senator Chuck Schumer to fight the deal, stating:

“…wrongdoers must be punished, not rewarded; liars must be checked, not trusted; and terrorists must remain the objects of our enmity and the targets of our aggression, not our partners in negotiations or the subjects of our contrition.”[21]

Altman goes on to argue that the Deal will “embolden our enemies and discourage our allies” and urges Schumer to abandon his leadership ambitions to kill the deal.[22]

Political Activity

Altman has been fairly active as a donor and volunteer for Republican campaigns.  For example, Altman supported the campaigns of Miami Mayor Francis Suarez, Lt. Gov. Carlos Lopez Cantera, Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, and Sen. Marco Rubio, all Republicans.[23]  Altman has also donated exclusively to Republicans, giving $4750 over the last five years.[24]

Additionally, Altman is also a member of the Republican Jewish Coalition, the American Enterprise Institute Enterprise Club, and the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies.[25]

Overall Assessment

While Altman is undoubtedly an intelligent and talented attorney, his nomination looks likely to draw opposition due to a number of factors.

First, Altman is remarkably young.  As noted above, Altman is only 36 years old, younger than any judicial nominee in the last sixteen years.  While Altman has gained a significant degree of experience in his 36 years, he still falls short of the twelve years of practice requirement the ABA recommends (an admittedly arbitrary cutoff).  Second, Altman has spoken and written in support of conservative legal and policy outcomes.  While Altman’s opposition to the Iran Nuclear Deal could be dismissed as a personal view irrelevant to his jurisprudence, his endorsement of broad law enforcement powers to search suspects could draw the ire of civil liberties groups and those rightfully distrustful of granting broad police powers to law enforcement.

Taking together his age, his writings, and his political activism Altman may face a tougher confirmation process than his fellow Southern District nominees.


[1] Sen. Comm. on the Judiciary, 115th Cong., Roy Altman: Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees 1.

[2] See id. at 2.

[3] Id.

[4] Id. at 1.

[5] David Markus, Candidate List for U.S. Attorney Expands (UPDATED), Southern District of Florida Blog, June 7, 2017, http://sdfla.blogspot.com/2017/06/candidate-list-for-us-attorney-expands.html.  

[6] Jay Weaver, Trump Nominates First Woman Ever to be U.S. Attorney in South Florida, Miami Herald, June 7, 2018, https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article212767819.html.  

[7] David Markus, Breaking — JNC Makes the Cut to 10 Finalists for District Judge, Southern District of Florida Blog, Nov. 29, 2017, http://sdfla.blogspot.com/2017/11/breaking-jnc-makes-cut-to-10-finalists.html.

[8] See Altman, supra n. 1 at 40.

[9] Id. at 20.

[10] Id. at 20, 23-24.

[11] United States v. Baston, No. 13-20914-CR-CMA (S.D. Fla. 2013).

[12] Jay Weaver, Jamaican Man Denies Being Global Pimp in Miami Sex-Trafficking Trial, Miami Herald, June 24, 2014, http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article1968022.html.  

[13]See Altman, supra n. 1 at 22.

[14] See Air Crash Over the S. Indian Ocean, No. 16-mc-00184-KBJ (D.D.C. 2016) (Jackson, J.) (pending).

[15] Roy Altman, Judges for Lax Border Security, Wall St. Journal, Apr. 3, 2013, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323296504578397382773377250.  

[16] See United States v. Cotterman, 709 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc).

[17] See Altman, supra n. 15.

[18] Roy K. Altman, The Case for Incident-to-Arrest Searches of Cell Phones, 29 Crim. Just. 28 (Spring 2014).

[19] See id.

[20] See id.

[21] Roy K. Altman, Schumer Says the Right Thing on the Iran Deal – Now He Needs to Persuade Eleven More Senators, Nat’l Rev., Aug. 10, 2015, https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/08/charles-schumer-obama-iran-deal-senate-democrats/.

[22] See id.

[23] See Altman, supra n. 1 at 17-18.

[25] See Altman, supra n. 1 at 5-6.

Judge Rudy Ruiz – Nominee for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Rudy Ruiz, a state court judge in South Florida joined the bench at just 33 years old. Today, at age 39, he has been nominated to the federal bench.

Background

Rodolfo Armando Ruiz II was born in Miami in 1979.  Ruiz graduated from Duke University in 2002 and then from the Georgetown University Law Center in 2005.[1]

After graduation, Ruiz clerked for Judge Federico Moreno on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, and then joined the Miami Office of White & Case as an Associate.[2]  In 2009, he moved to the Miami-Dade County Attorney’s Office.[3]

In 2012, Ruiz became a County Court Judge, appointed to the position by Republican Governor Rick Scott.  In 2015, Ruiz was appointed by Scott to be a Circuit Court Judge on the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, where he sits to this day.

History of the Seat

Ruiz has been nominated for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  This seat opened on January 31, 2017, when Judge William Zloch moved to senior status.  In October 2017, Ruiz applied and interviewed with the Judicial Nominating Commission (JNC) formed by Florida Senators Marco Rubio and Bill Nelson.  The JNC chose Ruiz as one of ten finalists to be passed onto the Senators.[4]  After interviews with Rubio and Nelson, Ruiz was contacted by the Trump Administration in February 2018.[5]  After interviewing with the White House Counsel’s Office and the Department of Justice, Ruiz was formally nominated on May 8, 2018.

Legal Career

Ruiz began his legal career as a law clerk on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  After he left that position, Ruiz joined the Miami office of White & Case, working in the Corporate Latin America transactional practice group.[6]  While his work at the firm was primarily transactional, his next position at the Miami-Dade County Attorney’s Office focused on litigation.

As an Assistant County Attorney, Ruiz worked in the Tax & Finance, Torts, & Federal Litigation sections, handling tax, defense of tort claims, and civil rights cases respectively.  During his time at the office, Ruiz tried two cases in Florida state court as associate counsel, while trying six other cases as lead counsel before administrative agencies.[7]

Ruiz’s most prominent cases involved the defense of civil rights claims brought against Miami-Dade County.[8]  In one of the cases, which went to trial, the jury found for the plaintiff, but Ruiz successfully petitioned for a new trial, and defended the grant on appeal.[9]

Jurisprudence

Ruiz served as a County Court Judge in Florida from 2012 to 2015 and has served as a Circuit Judge since 2015.  In the former capacity, Ruiz heard criminal misdemeanor and traffic matters, civil protective orders, and landlord-tenant and small claims litigation.[10]  As a Circuit Judge, Ruiz handles major felonies and any civil cases with more than $15000 in controversy.  Over his six year tenure on state court, Ruiz has heard approximately 300 cases.

Among his more notable decisions, Ruiz vacated a jury award for a plaintiff who had slipped and fallen in the lobby of the defendant’s building,[11] denied a criminal defendant immunity under Florida’s Stand Your Ground law after he had stabbed his colleague,[12] and presided over a plaintiff’s vicarious liability victory in a case where the decedent was electrocuted by a hydraulic conveyor belt boom.[13]

During his tenure as a Circuit Judge, only one case has been overruled by a higher court, a relatively low reversal rate.

Writings

As a law student, Ruiz co-authored an article laying out the law governing Securities Fraud.[14]  The article breaks down the offenses that fall under the Securities Fraud umbrella, including Fraud and Insider Trading, as well as describing common defenses and enforcement mechanisms.[15]

Overall Assessment

While the 39-year-old Ruiz is on the younger end of judicial nominees put forward by the Administration, it is unlikely that Ruiz will attract too much opposition through the confirmation process.  First, Ruiz lacks a paper trail on controversial issues, having avoided op-eds and political activism.  Second, his record on the bench is relatively mainstream, with a low reversal rate.  Third, Ruiz is one of Trump’s few Hispanic nominees, and has a record of supporting minority lawyers, including membership in the Cuban American Bar Association and the Florida Muslim Bar Association.[16]

Furthermore,despite his youth, Ruiz narrowly meets the ABA cutoff of twelve years of legal experience to take the federal bench.  As such, Democrats are likely to keep their powder dry and focus their fire on other nominees.

 


[1] Sen. Comm. on the Judiciary, 115th Cong., Rodolfo Ruiz: Questionnaire for Judicial Nominees 1.

[2] Id. at 2.

[3] Id.

[4] David Markus, Breaking — JNC Makes the Cut to 10 Finalists for District Judge, Southern District of Florida Blog, Nov. 29, 2017, http://sdfla.blogspot.com/2017/11/breaking-jnc-makes-cut-to-10-finalists.html.

[5] See Ruiz, supra n. 1 at 40.

[6] Id. at 41.

[7] Id. at 43.

[8] See Rolle v. Miami-Dade Cnty., Case No. 02-219101 CA 01 (25) (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct.), aff’d, 138 So. 3d 457 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (per curiam); Isaac v. Miami-Dade Cnty., Case No. 11-22698-CIV-PAS (S.D. Fla. 2011).

[9] See Rolle, supra n. 8.

[10] See Ruiz, supra n. 1 at 17.

[11] Gavers v. Espacio Miami Prop., LLC, Case No. 14-10879 CA 01 (22), 2017 WL 3047581 (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. June 8, 2017).

[12] State v. Quintana, Case No. F12-23033 (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct. Mar. 2, 2016).

[13] Aldana v. Miami Tile Deliveries Corp., Case No. 15-6122 CA 01 (22) (Fla. 11th Cir. Ct.).

[14] XueMing Jimmy Cheng, Ryan Harrington and Rodolfo Ruiz II, Securities Fraud, 41 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1079 (2004).

[15] See id.

[16] See Ruiz, supra n. 1 at 5-6.