Judge Florence Pan – Nominee to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

In 2016, D.C. Superior Court Judge Florence Pan became the first Asian woman tapped for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.  Despite a favorable recommendation from the Republican-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee, Pan’s nomination was never confirmed.  Now, more than four years later, Pan has a second chance to join the federal bench.     


Born in 1966, Florence Yu Pan graduated summa cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania in 1988 and then received her J.D. cum laude from Stanford Law School in 1993. 

After graduating, Pan clerked for Judge Michael Mukasey on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and for Judge Ralph Winter on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit before joining the Department of Justice as a Bristow Fellow in the Office of the Solicitor General.  Pan then worked in the Department of Treasury between 1998 and 1999.

In 1999, Pan became a federal prosecutor with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.  She stayed with the office until her appointment by President Obama to the D.C. Superior Court in 2009.  

On April 28, 2016, Pan was nominated by President Barack Obama to become a U.S. District Judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, replacing Judge Reggie Walton.  However, her nomination was not confirmed by the U.S. Senate, which was then under Republican control, and after President Donald Trump was elected, he nominated Dabney Freidrich to fill the vacancy.

History of the Seat

The seat Pan has been nominated for will open upon the confirmation of Judge Ketanji Jackson to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.  

Legal Experience

Pan started her legal career as a clerk to Judge Michael Mukasey on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and then for Judge Ralph Winter on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.  Since then, Pan worked for the federal government until her appointment to the D.C. Superior Court, going from the Department of Justice to the Department of the Treasury to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.  During her tenure, Pan tried around forty cases, half of which were jury trials. 

Among the significant matters that she worked on, Pan argued before the en banc D.C. Circuit in support of the police partially unzipping the jacket of a suspect during a Terry stop. See U.S. v. Askew, 529 F.3d 1119 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (en banc).  The D.C. Circuit ruled against her on the issue, finding that the facts surrounding the stop did not create reasonable suspicion for unzipping the jacket. See id.

Pan also argued in front of the D.C. Court of Appeals in defending a conviction against a defendant alleging an insanity defense to killing her child. See McNeil v. United States, 933 A.2d 354 (D.C. 2007).  The D.C. Court of Appeals overturned the conviction, finding that the prosecutor below improperly used the defendant’s invocation of her Miranda rights to argue that she was sane. See id. at 369.

Judicial Experience

Since her confirmation in 2009, Pan has served as a Judge on the D.C. Superior Court.  She started her time in the court on a Felony docket, but has since served on the Family, Misdemeanor, and Civil dockets as well.     

While serving on the Felony docket, Pan presided over a number of prosecutions of violent offenders, frequently handing out significant sentences, including a 15-year-sentence for a man who assaulted a victim in LeDroit Park, a 12-year-sentence for a man who stabbed the victim in Southeast D.C., and a 60-year-sentence to Antwon Pitt, who sexually assaulted a woman in Southeast D.C. as part of two home invasions.  On the civil side, Pan dismissed a lawsuit filed by the Center for Inquiry against Walmart for selling homeopathic medicines.

In her twelve years on the bench, a handful of Pan’s rulings have been reversed by the D.C. Court of Appeals.  In two cases, Pan presided over convictions for assault with significant bodily injury that were reversed because the Court of Appeals found insufficient evidence of significant injury. Compare In re D.P., 122 A.3d 903 (D.C. 2015) with Quintanilla v. United States, 62 A.3d 1261 (D.C. 2013).  On the civil side, in 2020, the D.C. Court of Appeals reversed Pan’s decision not to award treble damages in a wage-and-hour suit, finding that she had no discretion not to award the damages. Sivaraman v. Guizzetti & Associates., 228 A.3d 1066 (D.C. 2020).

Political Activity

Pan made a $500 contribution to the Presidential Campaign of John Kerry in 2004, her only contribution of record.  

Overall Assessment

This will be the third time that Pan has faced the U.S. Senate. In 2009, she was confirmed unanimously by a Democratic-controlled Senate. In 2016, she was approved by a Republican-controlled Committee but ultimately did not receive a confirmation vote before the U.S. Senate. Today, with a relatively uncontroversial moderate-liberal record, Pan is favored for a bipartisan confirmation.


  1. Another nominee that is on the older side however just like Regina Rodriguez & Justin Neals, she was an Obama appointee that never received a vote. I hope this is the last of such picks as President Biden has a wealth of younger & more progressive nominees he could appoint, especially where a Republican blue slip wouldn’t block it from getting a committee hearing.


  2. Pingback: Where We Stand: Assessing Vacancies and Nominations in the Federal Judiciary – The Atlantic Coast | The Vetting Room

  3. When can a replacement at the Superior Court be expected?
    The court is desperately short 13 of 62 judges, and two more vacancies are opening in Dezember 2021 and January 2022.
    There are three nominees pending on the floor, so how are the chances, that they can be confirmed until the end of the year?
    Otherwise the situation become worse.


    • While the Superior Court of DC is important, the judges are appointed for 15 years & not lifetime appointments. So I want senator Schumer to prioritize the court of appeals & district courts. But f he would either start keeping the senate in session for the entire day on Monday’s and/or Friday’s, vote for cloture on Thursday’s for multiple judges (prioritizing appeals court nominees) while using the weekends to eat up cloture time then come in the following Monday to vote on confirmation, or cancel one week of vacation then he would be able to confirm every nominee currently pending plus the next batch or two waiting to be voted out of committee by the end of the year.

      I doubt he will do most of those suggestions sadly.


      • I agree with you in most terms, because three and a half day working week with one at least one week state work periode is much too few.
        But I also believe, that the cizitens of Washington D. C. mustn’t be the sufferer of disinterest of the various administrations, committees and the Senate itself because of the bizarre construction of appointment or that they just have a term of 15 years.
        No doubt, that the Committee for Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs dislikes this duty as much as the Senate, I saw the hearing and the executive meeting. It was almost as bad as the Judiciary Meeting, where Alex Padilla was present only at the second panel.
        Nobody pressurizes Schumer to bring them forward to a floor vote.
        After Biden took Pan away from the Superior Court, the confirmation of these three nominees (Lopez, Putagunta and Staples) would not really improve the situation with the two upcoming retirements, only conserve it. In the moment there are four further nominees and one announced for the remaining ten vacancies, so they also have to hurry a bit.
        At the District of Columbia Court of Appeals the situation is similar.


      • Oh don’t get me wrong. I want the nominees for the to be confirmed. At the end of he day the senate takes too much time off, weekly & vacation weeks. There’s only so much floor time with the current schedule which isn’t sufficient & that is the real problem.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s