A civil rights attorney based in Atlanta, Sarah Geraghty has spent much of her career litigating to reform criminal justice institutions in Georgia.
Sarah Elizabeth Geraghty got a B.A. from Northwestern University in 1996, a Master in Social Work from the University of Michigan School of Social Work in 1998 and a J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School in 1999. Following law school, Geraghty clerked for Judge James Zagel on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and then spent a year with the Office of the Appellate Defender in New York. Since 2003, Geraghty has worked for the Southern Center for Human Rights, managing their Impact Litigation Unit from 2015 to 2020.
History of the Seat
Geraghty has been nominated for a seat on the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. This seat was vacated on April 3, 2021, when Judge Amy Totenberg moved to senior status.
While Geraghty started her career at the Office of the Appellate Defender in New York, she has spent the vast majority of her career at the Southern Center for Human Rights, a nonprofit organization focused on civil rights litigation on behalf of those in the criminal justice system. Early in her tenure with the Center, Geraghty sued the state of Georgia to force changes in the Lee Arrendale State Prison, where inmates were repeatedly subjected to physical and sexual violence. See Carlos Campos, Prison Shake-Up to Protect Youth; State to Make Alto Mostly for Women, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Nov. 19, 2004. In a different case, Geraghty successfully obtained a ruling preventing a Clinch County sheriff from charging inmates for room and board. Carlos Campos, Clinch County Inmates No Longer Charged Room and Board, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Apr. 18, 2006.
Notably, Geraghty filed a lawsuit against a Georgia law that increased restrictions on the movement, employment, and residence of convicted sex offenders. See Jill Young Miller, Tougher Law For Sex Offenders Under Fire; Human Rights Groups Challenge Restrictions, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, June 20, 2006. As a result of her suit, the law was enjoined by U.S. District Judge Clarence Cooper. See Jill Young Miller, Sex Offender Evictions Put on Hold, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, July 29, 2006. The law’s residency requirement, which barred sex offenders from living within 1000 feet of anywhere that children congregate, was also thrown out by the Georgia Supreme Court in a separate suit. See Rhonda Cook, Bill Rankin, No More Eviction for Sex Offenders; State’s High Court Says They Can Reside Legally in Areas Near Children, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Nov. 22, 2007. Geraghty later discussed the litigation and the issues with the law in a 2007 law review article. See Sarah Geraghty, Residency Restrictions on Sex Offenders: Challenging the Banishment of Registered Sex Offenders From the State of Georgia: A Practitioner’s Perspective, 42 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 513 (Summer 2007).
Among other matters, Geraghty successfully challenged child support judgments against Frank Hatley, a South Georgia man who was not the biological father of the child he was ordered to support. Bill Rankin, State Moves to Cancel Bill to Non-Dad It Had Jailed, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, July 25, 2009. Geraghty also filed a class action suit on behalf of indigent parents jailed for missing child support payments, arguing that they should have appointed counsel. Bill Rankin, Child Support Lawsuit Gets Class-Action Status, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Jan. 4, 2012. The plaintiffs ultimately lost 6-1 before the Georgia Supreme Court. Richard Halicks, Georgia Supreme Court; Child Support Inmates Lose Case, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, July 12, 2014.
Writings and Statements
As part of her role at the Southern Center for Human Rights, Geraghty has frequently spoken and commented on the law. We have summarized some of her statements and writings below.
Geraghty has spoken out on the need to better control violence in the prison system. For example, Geraghty called out officials who treated prison violence as inevitable, stating:
“It’s an attitude of ‘boys will be boys’ and that’s an attitude that I find very disturbing when we’re talking about the safety of young children.” See Carlos Campos, Surviving Behind Bars: Violence Stalks Young Men in Alto Prison, Critics Say, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Aug. 8, 2004 (quoting Sarah Geraghty).
In a later article, Geraghty criticized prisons for failing to adequately maintain door locks, leading to the deaths of four prisoners. See Aaron Gould Sheinin, Rhonda Cook, AJC Investigation: Faulty Locks Plague Prisons Across Georgia, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, July 2, 2013.
Geraghty has been vocal on the issue of reform of the private probation industry, speaking out, for example, against efforts to shield industry data from the public. See Rhonda Cook, Heat Turned Up on Probation, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Mar. 19, 2014. Geraghty has also been critical of the companies’ reliance on fees from the parolees they supervise. See Carrie Teegarden, Probation Companies Facing Slate of Reforms, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Mar. 1, 2015. Geraghty has also criticized the handling of probation by private companies, stating:
“The concept of privatized probation is fundamentally at odds with the fair administration of justice.” See Rhonda Cook, Private Probation Firm Settles Suits For $2M, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Feb. 4, 2017.
Geraghty’s comments on private probations are consistent with her more broadly expressed views about the need for reform of criminal justice institutions in the South. See Sarah Geraghty and Melanie Velez, Bringing Transparency and Accountability to Criminal Justice Institutions in the South, 22 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. 455 (2011).
Geraghty has also testified and spoken on the provision of counsel for the indigent. In 2015, Geraghty testified against a bill that would eliminate some of the minimum standards for indigent counsel. See Bill Rankin, Public Defender Reforms At Risk, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Mar. 2, 2015.
Geraghty has made two political contributions, both to Democratic Gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams in 2018.
Having spent much of her career litigating to reform the criminal justice system, Geraghty would bring an unusual perspective to a bench dominated by veterans of that system. It is likely that her career and strongly expressed views will draw questions and opposition. Whether Geraghty manages to overcome those barriers and join the bench rests largely on the durability of her support in the Democratic caucus.
SOLID pick. Thank you judge Amy Totenberg for taking senior status stating she will still work a full case load but will allow President Biden to name an active judge to the court. Take note Democrat appointed judges who is eligible for senior status.
This is a solid nominee with a proven progressive record in her late 40’s.
The Georgia nominees so far have been from quite progressive backgrounds, especially compared to more traditional blue states such as New Jersey and Washington. The progressive legal community should make one of their top priorities getting Warnock reelected in 2022.
Absolutely, 100%. I would say the senators from New York, New Mexico & Georgia have done the best job with their recommendations for federal judges. Connecticut did a good job as well & I’m excited 3 out of those 4 states currently have a vacancy on the appeals court.
New Jersey has so far been the biggest disappointment with Washington state not too far behind. Both of those states currently have additional district court vacancies to fill so I am hoping they put forward younger & more progressive nominees.
Might need Kamala for the tie-break on this nomination.
David Estudillo & Christine O’Hearn are Biden’s worst picks so far & they only got 54 & 53 YES votes respectively. At this point there is a block of GOP senators that are just voting no regardless of the nominee. Democrats need to treat 50 votes as if its 75 at this point. This has been the greatest week so far for judicial confirmations since Biden took office. Keep ’em coming Chuck
You have a good point on Estudillo, but not O’Hearn. The main reason why the GOP senators on the committee voted no on O’Hearn was that she was unable to answer basic questions about constitutional law. Progressives should have used that as an excuse to junk O’Hearn, who was a horrible choice to begin with. We would be better off with an empty seat there.
That actually proves the point I was making Shawn. O’Hearn could barley answer basic legal questions at her hearing while Estudillo gave solid answers (Despite what I personally think of him being nominated by a Democrat president in a state with two Democrat senators). Despite that Estudillo only got ONE more vote then O’Hearn. So qualifications don’t matter to a block of the GOP senators, they are voting no regardless.
Take a look at the only judges to get a filibuster proof majority vote so far this year;
Tiffany P. Cunningham “63 votes” – Nominated to the Federal Circuit which traditionally doesn’t get the same option as the other 12 appeals courts.
Julien Neals “66 votes – A former Obama nominee that was voted out of committee back then overwhelmingly & is 56 years old.
Regina M. Rodriguez “72 votes – A former Obama nominee that was voted out of committee back then overwhelmingly & is 58 years old.
Zahid Quraishi “81 votes” – Historic pick as the first Muslim federal judge ever.
Florence Y. Pan “54 votes – A former Obama nominee that was voted out of committee back then unanimously & is 54 years old. Also her husband has some connections with Republicans.
Patricia Tolliver Giles – She was on the short list for a nomination to the same court by President Trump.
So out of 25 confirmed judges, only 6 would have been able to get enough votes to overcome a filibuster if it was still in place. So not being able to answer basic questions at the nominees hearing has little to do with Republican no votes based on the numbers. This Republican party is just the party of no at this point.
On another note, Sen. Feinstein has not shown up any of these votes on judges. For heaven’s sake, if you are unable to do your job, resign ASAP!
Yup. I mentioned that on another post as well. In the last executive meeting it was mentioned she had a family emergency which I get. But she missed several votes preceding that. It’s sad out if 39 million people in one of the most liberal states in the union she is one of two US senators. Herself as well as justice Breyer are risking their legacies by staying on the job long past when they should.
Estudillo having practiced immigration law probably scared away GOP senators. Still it’s a terrible precedent for the GOP en block to basically vote against all judicial nominees. Myrna Perez is one thing but there wasn’t any real reason for the GOP to vote no on Estudillo.
Right, exactly my point. The GOP should have been rushing to confirm Estudillo 100 – 0. O’Hearn I understand because besides being a career management/corporate side lawyer, she couldn’t answer basic questions at her hearing. But Estudillo is solid, I’m just mad a Democrat president nominated him from a state with two Democrat senators. Had Trump nominated him or Biden to a stae with at least one GOP senator then I would have supported his nomination.
A minor quibble: I think her middle name is spelled “Elisabeth”–with a “s” rather than a “z”…